College Football Playoff Overhaul

College Football Playoff Overhaul

The College Football Playoff (CFP) is set to undergo a major overhaul, with the current postseason format expiring at the end of this year. The Southeastern Conference (SEC) commissioner, Greg Sankey, has expressed openness to revising the format during a recent meeting. However, he declined to specify how his conference thinks the playoff should be structured.

Proposed Models

One widely discussed model would allocate:

  • Four automatic bids each to the Big Ten and SEC conferences
  • Two automatic bids each to the Atlantic Coast Conference (ACC) and Big 12

Sankey acknowledged that there is no agreement on a specific model within his room at this time, stating, "We’re open-minded about it. There’s no agreement on a specific model within our room at this time."

Considerations for Smaller Schools

Sankey emphasized that any new format should consider:

  • Conference priorities
  • Opportunities for smaller schools

He noted that some models might focus on creating more chances for these schools to compete in bowl games rather than relegating them to lower-tier matchups after missing out on New Year’s Six appearances due to poor performance earlier in their seasons.

Changes to Seeding Model

The CFP committee announced that it will implement a straight seeding model starting next year, moving away from the previous ranking system of teams from No. 1 through eight followed by five at-large selections. Notably, Notre Dame will receive an automatic bid regardless of its standing.

Ongoing Discussions and Frustrations

In addition to discussing potential changes, playoff expansion plans are set for introduction following an upcoming NCAA court ruling regarding name-image-likeness compensation rules affecting student athletes nationwide. Sankey expressed frustration over recent comments made by ACC Commissioner Jim Phillips and Big 12 Conference President Brett Yormark.

Phillips and Yormark have stated they remain committed to supporting their original proposal despite concerns raised within Power Five conferences regarding:

  • Fairness and equity implications associated with expanded field size
  • Increased competition among larger programs
  • Diminished chances for smaller programs to compete against top-tier opponents without sacrificing valuable home dates along the way.
FacebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutubeFacebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutube
FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *