Argentine Court Declares Mistrial in Maradona Death Case

Argentine Court Declares Mistrial in Maradona Death Case

An Argentine court declared a mistrial on Thursday in the case of seven health professionals accused of negligence in the death of soccer legend Diego Maradona. The judges ruled that there would be a new trial, but did not specify when.

Background

The decision follows the resignation of Judge Julieta Makintach, one of the three judges overseeing the trial. Her resignation came after criticism regarding her participation in a documentary series about the case. Prosecutors requested her recusal, leading to her stepping down from the criminal proceeding.

Allegations Against Judge Makintach

  • Involvement in Documentary: Prosecutors alleged that Makintach allowed camera crews into private areas, including hearing rooms and testimony sessions, while serving as president judge at Criminal Court No. 2 since January 2021.
  • Payment for Participation: It was claimed that she was paid $50 per hour by producers working on "Divine Justice," a reality TV-style series filming at the Buenos Aires courthouse.

Makintach denied any involvement with the production company behind "Divine Justice," stating that she only received payment for work done outside courtroom hours during pandemic lockdowns. She was unaware if others were also compensated and acknowledged knowing producer Daniel Hadida through mutual friends prior to her judicial career.

Evidence Presented

Prosecutor Marcelo Martinez presented evidence against Makintach, including:

  • A trailer for the documentary that intercuts archival footage of Maradona scoring iconic goals with behind-the-scenes shots.
  • Testimonies from five individuals involved in making "Divine Justice," including director Pablo Vengas, who testified under oath earlier this month.

Vengas stated he had never met Judge Makintach before being introduced via video conference by Hadida last year. Hadida testified that he was unsure if anyone else knew the payment details for participants, stating they were paid $100 per day plus expenses, though he did not specify what those expenses entailed.

Conclusion

The other two judges voted unanimously with Savarino that there should be no retrial due to potential irreparable damage, but acknowledged the necessity of a new trial given the circumstances surrounding the investigation between May 24 and June 7.

FacebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutubeFacebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutube
FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *