Silicon Valley Investors Caught in the Middle of Trump-Musk Feud

Silicon Valley Investors Caught in the Middle of Trump-Musk Feud

A public breakup between US President Donald Trump and the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, has left some of their high-profile supporters in Silicon Valley scrambling to choose sides.

The Feud Begins

The feud began this week when Musk used his social media platform, X, to denounce Trump’s "One Big Beautiful Bill Act." Experts say the bill would:

  • Cut taxes
  • Reduce healthcare benefits for poor people
  • Increase funding for immigration enforcement
  • Add trillions to the federal deficit

Musk called the bill "a disgusting abomination" and claimed Congress is "making America bankrupt."

Trump responded by suggesting he might cancel contracts with Musk’s companies. During a press conference, he floated another potential consequence: that Musk was angry about part of the bill eliminating subsidies for electric vehicles that benefit Tesla. "They’re going after our cars," Trump said.

Pressure on Silicon Valley Investors

Some of Musk’s closest associates from Silicon Valley are now under pressure to decide whether to align themselves with their friend or continue supporting their former ally in Washington. Notable investors caught in the middle include:

  • David Sacks
  • Marc Andreessen

Support for Musk

Shaun Maguire, a partner at Sequoia Capital who donated $300,000 last year to Donald J. Trump 2024 Inc., praised Musk on Twitter, stating:

"’Elon leaves it all on the field,’ he tweeted yesterday morning; ‘he puts what he believes in ahead of himself.’ How can you not be inspired by that?"

Balancing Support for Both

Gerstner, founder and CEO at Altimeter Capital (which has invested heavily in Tesla), expressed support for both men but emphasized his views on budget reform during an interview at #TCDisrupt. He stated:

"’I’m a big fan of Elon…& I also believe & have fought 30 years over the fact we need some sort of balanced budget amendment in the country,’" as reported by Bloomberg.

Gerstner hopes the country will adopt a four- or five-year plan laid out by Trump’s administration but warned against living beyond its means through borrowing that will eventually come due.

Discussion on Budget Reform

In response to Gerstner’s comments about needing a balanced budget amendment, one attendee asked if such an amendment would require cuts like those proposed by House Republicans. Gerstner replied:

"I don’t think so."

He explained that any cuts should be based on priorities rather than just across-the-board reductions, stating:

"That’s not how you get there."

Gerstner also expressed skepticism about raising taxes as a solution, arguing that it could stifle economic growth:

"It’s hard enough getting people back out there working again."

FacebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutubeFacebooktwitterlinkedinrssyoutube
FacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmailFacebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *